Satellite Frequency Bands Explained: L, S, C, X, Ku, and Ka in SATCOM Systems

Introduction

Frequency selection is the first—and most consequential—engineering decision in any satellite system design. Before you specify an orbital slot, define a link budget, or select a terminal form factor, you must answer a foundational question: which part of the radio spectrum will carry your signal?

The answer determines almost every downstream parameter: how much bandwidth you can access, how large your antenna needs to be, how vulnerable your link is to rain attenuation, what regulatory framework governs your spectrum access, and ultimately what level of service you can guarantee to end users.

The governing trade-off is straightforward in principle but complex in practice. Lower frequencies propagate more robustly—they penetrate vegetation, tolerate rain, diffract around obstacles, and work with small omnidirectional antennas. But lower frequencies also mean less available bandwidth and therefore less throughput. Higher frequencies offer far more spectrum and support high-throughput systems with compact apertures, but they suffer increasingly severe atmospheric attenuation and require precise pointing and adaptive link management.

Regulatory context adds another layer. Satellite frequency assignments are governed by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) Radio Regulations, which define which frequency bands are available to the Fixed Satellite Service (FSS), Mobile Satellite Service (MSS), Broadcasting Satellite Service (BSS), and government/military allocations. Coordination with terrestrial services—particularly cellular networks and point-to-point microwave—is mandatory in many bands. No engineer selects a satellite frequency in isolation from the regulatory environment.

This article provides an engineering-level reference for the six primary satellite frequency bands—L, S, C, X, Ku, and Ka—covering propagation characteristics, spectrum allocations, hardware implications, commercial and military use cases, and the trade-offs that govern band selection in real system deployments.

---

L and S Bands

L Band (1–2 GHz)

L band is the lowest commercially allocated frequency range for satellite communications and the natural home of mobile satellite services (MSS). The ITU allocates portions of the 1.5–1.6 GHz range to MSS, which underpins the major global mobile satellite operators: Inmarsat (with its BGAN, Fleet Xpress, and ELERA products), Iridium (L-band LEO with spot coverage of every point on Earth), and Thuraya (GEO regional MSS coverage over Europe, Africa, and Asia).

Beyond MSS, L band hosts the global navigation satellite systems (GNSS): GPS operates at L1 (1575.42 MHz), L2 (1227.60 MHz), and L5 (1176.45 MHz); Galileo, GLONASS, and BeiDou occupy overlapping sub-bands. The Automatic Identification System (AIS) for maritime vessel tracking operates at 161.975 and 162.025 MHz—at the boundary of VHF and adjacent to the lower L-band allocations.

Propagation advantages: L-band signals experience less than 0.5 dB of rain attenuation in virtually any storm, and the longer wavelength (15–30 cm) allows signals to partially diffract around obstructions. An L-band terminal maintains a link at elevation angles as low as 5–10° with modest degradation—a critical property for maritime and polar applications where GEO satellite elevations are low.

Throughput limitations: Available bandwidth in L band is extremely scarce—major MSS operators have access to 30–50 MHz of total spectrum, shared across their entire subscriber base. Typical throughput per user is 384 kbps for BGAN broadband terminals; some services are as low as 2.4 kbps for data-only IoT links. L band is simply incompatible with broadband applications as understood today.

Use cases: Emergency communications, maritime distress (GMDSS), aviation safety services, remote IoT and M2M telemetry, personnel tracking in field environments. For maritime L-band GMDSS context, see Maritime Satellite Internet.

S Band (2–4 GHz)

S band sits between L and C band and serves a narrower set of satellite applications. Weather satellites—including the NOAA GOES series and European Meteosat—use S band for data downlinks from geostationary orbit. NASA's Deep Space Network uses S band for near-Earth link communications with low-Earth-orbit spacecraft. Some MSS systems, including legacy Globalstar handsets, use S band for user downlinks paired with L-band uplinks.

S band shares spectrum with terrestrial services including radar systems, some ISM (industrial, scientific, medical) devices, and 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi—which creates interference coordination challenges. Available satellite spectrum in S band is highly fragmented and subject to significant coordination burden.

Use cases: Weather satellite downlinks, Earth observation, NASA near-Earth communications, some emerging narrowband IoT constellations (particularly in low Earth orbit, where S-band LEO satellites can illuminate large areas with modest antennas).

L and S Band Summary

Both bands are defined by their resilience—they are the only frequencies that reliably support communications to hand-held or omnidirectional terminals in adverse conditions. This robustness comes at the direct cost of capacity. No satellite operator has delivered broadband throughput in L or S band; these bands serve connectivity requirements where some data is better than no data, and link reliability at any throughput is the primary SLA.

---

C Band

C band, occupying roughly 4–8 GHz, was the first commercially exploited satellite frequency band and remains critical infrastructure for a significant fraction of global satellite traffic.

Frequency allocations: The FSS downlink (space-to-Earth) uses 3.7–4.2 GHz; the FSS uplink (Earth-to-space) uses 5.925–6.425 GHz. Extended C-band downlinks extend to 3.4–3.7 GHz in some regions. The total available bandwidth is approximately 500 MHz in each direction.

Rain fade immunity: C band's most important engineering property is its near-immunity to rain attenuation. In tropical regions—which receive the world's heaviest rainfall events—C-band links typically experience less than 1 dB of additional attenuation during even severe storms. At Ku band, the same storm would cause 6–10 dB of attenuation; at Ka band, 15–25 dB. This is why C band remains dominant for broadcast distribution, trunking, and any application where high availability in equatorial or tropical climates is non-negotiable.

Antenna size: The longer wavelength of C band (~6–7.5 cm) means antennas must be physically larger to achieve a given gain. A C-band VSAT terminal typically requires a 1.8–3.6 m dish for enterprise VSAT applications—far larger than a Ku or Ka terminal of equivalent gain. This is a major limitation for mobile, aero, and many enterprise installations where aperture size is constrained.

Commercial dominance: C band underpins global broadcast distribution. News agencies, sports rights holders, and television networks distribute feeds to terrestrial broadcast facilities via C-band satellite links. Teleports operate large C-band antenna farms to aggregate and redistribute this content. Long-haul backbone trunking—particularly across the Pacific and Indian Ocean regions where C band's availability advantage over Ku is strongest—remains a C-band stronghold.

Spectrum pressure: The 3.7–4.2 GHz downlink band in the United States was partially repurposed for 5G terrestrial use following the FCC's 2020 C-band spectrum auction, which raised $81.1 billion. Incumbent satellite operators were paid to transition to the 4.0–4.2 GHz portion of the band, freeing the 3.7–4.0 GHz segment for 5G deployment. This process—accelerated clearing—is ongoing and represents the most significant spectrum reallocation in C band's commercial history. For teleport operations that depend on C-band infrastructure, see Satellite Gateways, Teleports & PoPs.

Use cases: Broadcast content distribution, long-haul trunking, hub-to-hub connectivity, tropical and equatorial VSAT where rain fade would otherwise impair Ku or Ka service, cable headend downlinks.

---

X Band

X band occupies the 8–12 GHz range, with the satellite segment using 7.25–7.75 GHz for downlinks and 7.9–8.4 GHz for uplinks. Unlike the other bands discussed in this article, X band is allocated almost exclusively to government and military users in most national regulatory frameworks.

Why X band is not commercially available: The ITU and most national regulators designate X-band satellite spectrum primarily for government fixed-satellite service. Commercial operators have very limited access to X-band transponders—the available capacity is reserved for defense ministries, intelligence communities, and emergency response agencies. A private enterprise seeking commercial VSAT service cannot purchase X-band capacity through the same channels as Ku or Ka service.

Technical advantages over adjacent bands: X band occupies a useful engineering position between C and Ku. It offers better rain margin than Ku (attenuation is lower at 8 GHz than at 12 GHz by approximately 3–4 dB in heavy rain) while providing more available bandwidth than C band and compatible with smaller antennas than C band. These properties make it particularly suitable for terminals that must operate in diverse environments—tactical vehicles, ship-borne government systems, and transportable ground stations.

Primary system: Wideband Global SATCOM (WGS): The US Department of Defense's WGS constellation is the dominant X-band satellite system in operation. WGS provides wideband X-band (and also Ka-band) services to US and allied military forces. The system supports beyond-line-of-sight communications for aircraft, ships, and ground forces. The X-band terminals used by WGS are standardized military systems—not commercially available VSAT equipment.

Other government users: NATO nations operate X-band military satellite systems including NATO's own Skynet (UK) and XTAR (USA/Spain). Disaster response agencies in some countries have access to government X-band capacity for emergency communications when terrestrial infrastructure fails.

Use cases: Military SATCOM (MILSATCOM), government intelligence and reconnaissance communications, allied nation military connectivity, tactical communications for deployed forces.

---

Ku Band

Ku band, spanning 10.7–12.75 GHz for downlinks and 13.75–14.5 GHz for uplinks, is the commercial satellite industry's most widely deployed frequency range. The majority of enterprise VSAT networks, maritime broadband systems, and aeronautical connectivity services operate in Ku band.

Why Ku dominates commercial VSAT: Ku band strikes the best balance of properties for commercial use at the current state of technology. Antennas are practical in size—0.75 to 1.8 m for maritime and enterprise VSAT applications, and as small as 0.45 m for some aeronautical systems. Available bandwidth per transponder (typically 36 or 54 MHz) is sufficient for meaningful broadband services. The frequency is high enough that orbital arc spacing allows adequate satellite density, and low enough that rain attenuation is manageable with proper link margin design.

Antenna sizing: Ku-band wavelength (~2.5 cm) allows a 1.2 m dish to achieve approximately 42 dBi of gain—comparable to what a 3.6 m C-band dish achieves. This enables Ku-band VSAT systems to be deployed on ships (where aperture is heavily constrained by windage, deck space, and radome size limits), aircraft (where weight and drag are critical), and enterprise sites where a large dish would be impractical or aesthetically unacceptable.

Rain fade characteristics: Ku band is susceptible to rain attenuation. In temperate climates (Europe, North America), achieving 99.5% annual availability on a Ku-band link typically requires 3–6 dB of additional fade margin in the link budget—margin that must be "purchased" through either higher satellite EIRP, larger antenna aperture, or conservative MODCOD selection. In tropical and equatorial climates, the rain fade budget for equivalent availability rises dramatically (8–12 dB or more), which is why many tropical deployments prefer C band or use ACM aggressively. See Satellite Modulation and Coding for MODCOD selection under rain fade constraints.

Orbital and spectrum congestion: The GEO arc in popular orbital windows (particularly over the Atlantic, covering both Americas and Europe) is significantly congested with Ku-band satellites. Adjacent satellite interference coordination is a major engineering discipline for large Ku-band VSAT networks—cross-polar discrimination, EIRP limits, spectral masks, and ITU coordination procedures all constrain system design. This congestion is also reflected in commercial bandwidth pricing: Ku-band MHz over prime arc positions remains expensive.

Major satellite operators: SES, Eutelsat, Intelsat, and Telesat operate large Ku-band fleets. Historical HTS deployments on Ku band include ViaSat-1's Ku-band coverage area and the Eutelsat Ka-Sat (which is, confusingly, a Ku-band name for a Ka-band HTS—demonstrating the marketing complexity around frequency terminology in the industry).

Use cases: Enterprise WAN over VSAT, maritime broadband for commercial shipping and cruise vessels, aeronautical passenger Wi-Fi (IFC), broadcast uplinks, DSNG (digital satellite news gathering). For deeper Ku versus Ka comparison, see Ku Band vs Ka Band Satellite.

---

Ka Band

Ka band—spanning approximately 26.5–40 GHz, with the satellite segment using 17.7–21.2 GHz for downlinks and 27.5–31 GHz for uplinks—is the frequency range where the modern high-throughput satellite (HTS) revolution is happening. Ka band is simultaneously the highest-capacity and highest-risk frequency band available for commercial satellite communications.

Why Ka enables HTS: The physics of Ka band enable the fundamental HTS architecture: spot beam frequency reuse. A Ka-band satellite can use a narrow spot beam (covering perhaps 300–500 km diameter) to illuminate a small geographic area with a specific frequency channel, then reuse that same frequency in another spot beam pointed at a non-overlapping area. A Ka-band satellite with 60 spot beams can potentially reuse its 500 MHz of spectrum 60 times, achieving an aggregate throughput of tens or hundreds of gigabits per second—compared to a conventional C or Ku single-beam satellite with perhaps 500 Mbps of total capacity.

Bandwidth availability: The Ka-band satellite downlink allocation (17.7–21.2 GHz) represents approximately 3.5 GHz of total available bandwidth—roughly seven times the C-band FSS downlink allocation. This abundance of spectrum, combined with spot beam reuse, is why Ka band is the frequency of choice for HTS broadband satellites.

Rain fade susceptibility: Ka band's principal engineering challenge is rain attenuation. At Ka-band frequencies (20 GHz and above), rain attenuation scales with approximately the square of frequency. A moderate rain event (25 mm/hr) that causes 2 dB of attenuation at Ku band may cause 8–12 dB at Ka band. In tropical climates with convective rainfall regularly exceeding 100 mm/hr, Ka-band systems face attenuation events exceeding 20 dB—which is simply beyond the reach of any practical link margin reserve.

The mitigation strategy is Adaptive Coding and Modulation (ACM): rather than designing the link for worst-case conditions with a fixed MODCOD, ACM systems continuously measure link quality and step down to more robust (lower-order) MODCODs as fades develop, maintaining connectivity at reduced throughput rather than experiencing a hard outage. AUPC (Automatic Uplink Power Control) provides complementary fade mitigation on the uplink. See Rain Fade in Satellite Communications and Satellite Link Budget Calculation for the propagation physics and budget calculations.

Antenna implications: Because Ka band has a shorter wavelength (~1.5 cm), a smaller physical aperture achieves the same gain as a larger antenna at lower frequencies. A 0.75 m Ka-band dish achieves approximately the same gain as a 1.5 m Ku-band dish. This drives two important developments: (1) flat-panel electronically steered antennas (ESAs) become feasible at Ka band because the shorter wavelength allows more antenna elements per unit area at manufacturable element spacing; (2) phased-array designs (including Starlink's user terminal) become practical at Ka band in ways that are economically difficult at Ku band.

Major systems: ViaSat-3 (three-satellite global Ka-band HTS fleet targeting 1 Tbps total capacity), SES O3b mPOWER (MEO Ka-band with low latency, fiber-like performance), Hughes Jupiter 3 (ultra-high-density Ka-band GEO), Starlink (Ka and V-band LEO broadband), Amazon Project Kuiper (Ka-band LEO). The diversity of orbital regimes now operating in Ka band—GEO HTS, MEO, and LEO—reflects the frequency's capacity advantage and its adaptability to different architectural approaches.

Use cases: Consumer broadband (residential satellite internet), enterprise HTS broadband in temperate climates, maritime VSAT on large vessels with power and aperture budgets for robust link margins, aeronautical high-capacity IFC, cellular backhaul to remote tower sites.

---

Propagation Characteristics

Understanding why different frequency bands behave as they do requires grounding in the physics of radio wave propagation through the atmosphere.

Free-Space Path Loss

A common misconception is that higher-frequency signals experience more free-space path loss than lower-frequency signals at the same distance. This is technically true in the isotropic antenna framework (FSPL = (4πdf/c)²), but in practice it is offset by antenna aperture effects: a fixed-size aperture antenna has higher gain at higher frequencies. For properly sized antennas, the link budget is frequency-neutral for free-space path loss—the challenge is purely atmospheric.

Rain Attenuation

Rain attenuation is the dominant frequency-dependent impairment for commercial satellite bands above C band. Raindrops scatter and absorb electromagnetic energy in proportion to their size relative to the signal wavelength. When drop size is comparable to wavelength, absorption peaks—which occurs at Ka-band frequencies (wavelength ~1.5 cm) relative to typical raindrop sizes (0.1–5 mm).

The ITU-R P.618 model is the standard engineering tool for computing rain attenuation statistics at a given location, frequency, and availability target. The model uses local rainfall rate data (at the 0.01% exceedance level, typically) and computes the effective path length through rain based on elevation angle and rain height. The attenuation scales approximately as frequency squared above 10 GHz—meaning Ka band experiences roughly 4× more rain attenuation than Ku band in the same storm.

Tropospheric Scintillation

Tropospheric scintillation is rapid, random amplitude and phase fluctuation caused by refractive index inhomogeneities in the lower troposphere (below 2 km altitude). Scintillation is most pronounced at low elevation angles (below 10°) and at higher frequencies. For Ka-band links at low elevation—common in high-latitude coverage areas and on maritime vessels—scintillation can add 1–3 dB of fade margin requirement beyond the rain attenuation budget.

Gaseous Absorption

Molecular oxygen (O₂) has a strong absorption resonance at 60 GHz. Water vapor (H₂O) absorbs at 22.235 GHz and 183.310 GHz. Satellite frequency allocations are deliberately placed in atmospheric "windows" between these absorption peaks: Ka-band downlinks at 17.7–21.2 GHz sit just below the 22 GHz water vapor line, and uplinks at 27.5–31 GHz sit in a relatively clear window. Even so, gaseous absorption adds 0.3–0.5 dB of additional attenuation at Ka band compared to Ku band, which must be included in link budget calculations.

Summary Table

---

Frequency Selection Matrix

Frequency band selection is always a system-level decision. The matrix below summarizes which bands are appropriate for common deployment scenarios:

Key factors that drive band selection in any specific deployment:

• Geography and climate: Tropical deployments push toward C band for high availability; temperate regions can exploit Ka band's HTS capacity
• Terminal aperture constraints: Mobile, aero, and ship terminals favor Ku or Ka over C for aperture reasons; hand-portable terminals are L-band only
• Throughput requirement: IoT and emergency services → L/S; broadband enterprises and consumer → Ku/Ka; HTS capacity optimization → Ka
• Regulatory access: X band is not commercially available; C-band 3.7–4.0 GHz is being repurposed for 5G in some markets
• SLA and availability target: 99.99% availability in the tropics strongly favors C band; 99.5% in temperate regions is achievable in Ka with ACM

---

Frequently Asked Questions

What satellite frequency band is best for maritime communications?

The answer depends on the application. For safety of life at sea (SOLAS) distress communications and GMDSS compliance, L band is the only ITU-recognized option—Inmarsat's BGAN and Fleet Xpress terminals, along with Iridium, serve this role. For broadband crew and passenger services on commercial vessels, Ku band has historically dominated because of its balance of antenna size (practical on stabilized platforms) and availability. Ka band is increasingly used on cruise ships and large merchant vessels where higher capacity is required and the power/aperture budget supports the larger uplink EIRP needed for adequate rain margin. Some vessels operate dual Ku/Ka systems, dynamically routing traffic based on link quality.

Why does C band resist rain fade better than Ka band?

Rain attenuation scales with frequency roughly as f² above 10 GHz. A C-band downlink at 4 GHz has a wavelength of 7.5 cm—significantly longer than typical raindrop diameters (0.1–5 mm). The mismatch means raindrops are in the Rayleigh scattering regime at C band, where absorption and scattering are both very low. At Ka band (20 GHz, wavelength 1.5 cm), drop sizes are much more comparable to the wavelength, moving into the Mie scattering regime where attenuation is dramatically higher. Quantitatively: a rainfall rate of 25 mm/hr causes approximately 0.1 dB/km at C band but 4–6 dB/km at Ka band.

Is X band available for commercial satellite services?

In most national regulatory frameworks, no. X-band satellite spectrum is allocated to government fixed-satellite service with commercial access restricted. A small number of commercial X-band satellites do exist (XTAR, operated by Loral Space & Communications for US and allied government customers, being the primary example), but access requires government sponsorship or contract—it is not available through standard commercial VSAT procurement. Enterprises seeking commercial broadband must use C, Ku, or Ka band.

What is the difference between Ku-band and Ka-band throughput?

The throughput difference is driven by two factors: available bandwidth and spot beam frequency reuse. Ku-band transponders typically provide 36–72 MHz of bandwidth per beam over broad coverage areas (typically continental or ocean-region footprints). A Ka-band HTS satellite reuses its 500+ MHz of total spectrum across dozens of narrow spot beams, achieving aggregate throughputs of 100 Gbps or more from a single spacecraft. On a per-terminal basis, Ka-band HTS systems can offer 50–500 Mbps committed rates (depending on terminal aperture and network load), whereas a traditional wide-beam Ku-band VSAT might commit 10–50 Mbps. However, Ku-band is often the better choice for SLA-critical applications in rain-prone regions because the link margin budget is more manageable.

Why do high-throughput satellites use Ka band?

Three Ka-band properties converge to enable HTS architecture. First, the large available spectrum (3.5 GHz in the FSS downlink alone) provides raw capacity to fill. Second, the short wavelength enables narrow, high-gain spot beams from practical satellite antenna apertures—a Ka-band reflector that fits within a standard satellite launch envelope can form beams covering areas of 300–500 km diameter, compared to C-band beams that would be thousands of kilometers wide from the same reflector. Third, the narrow spot beams enable aggressive frequency reuse: the same 500 MHz can be reused in geographically separated beams with sufficient isolation, multiplying total system capacity by the number of non-overlapping beam clusters. These three properties together make Ka band uniquely suitable for delivering hundreds of gigabits per second of aggregate satellite capacity.

How does frequency affect antenna size in satellite systems?

The relationship is inverse: for a given antenna gain target, physical aperture scales with wavelength. Gain = η × (πD/λ)², where D is aperture diameter, λ is wavelength, and η is aperture efficiency (typically 0.55–0.65). For 45 dBi of gain at C band (λ = 7.5 cm), you need approximately a 4.5 m dish. For the same gain at Ku band (λ = 2.5 cm), a 1.5 m dish suffices. At Ka band (λ = 1.5 cm), a 0.9 m dish achieves equivalent gain. This 5:1 aperture reduction from C to Ka band is what makes Ka-band terminals small enough for aircraft and hand-carried applications—and why electronically steered flat panels, which scale in gain with frequency for a given panel area, are being commercialized at Ka band and above rather than at C or Ku.

Can the same VSAT terminal support both Ku and Ka band?

Not with a single RF chain and reflector. A standard parabolic reflector VSAT terminal is designed for a specific frequency band—the feed, LNB, and BUC are all frequency-specific components. However, dual-band terminals do exist: some maritime VSAT systems install separate Ku-band and Ka-band antennas on the same vessel and use network management software to route traffic across both based on link quality, pricing, or coverage availability. Flat-panel electronically steered antennas (ESAs) are being designed with wideband capability that could span multiple bands, but certified commercial dual-band Ka/Ku ESAs with full frequency agility are not yet widely deployed as of 2026.

---

Summary and Key Takeaways

Satellite frequency band selection is a system architecture decision that cannot be optimized in isolation—it must be evaluated against geography, throughput requirements, terminal constraints, regulatory access, and SLA targets simultaneously.

Lower bands (L, S): Defined by resilience and mobility. The only practical option for hand-portable terminals, safety services, and IoT applications that must work anywhere in any weather. Throughput is severely limited; these bands serve connectivity needs where link reliability is the primary value.

C band: The workhorse for high-availability broadcast and trunking, particularly in tropical and equatorial regions. Effective immunity to rain fade makes C band the only reasonable choice for 99.9%+ availability links in the heaviest rainfall zones. Large antenna requirements limit its utility for mobile and many enterprise edge applications.

X band: Technically well-positioned between C and Ku for robustness and antenna size, but commercially inaccessible. A government-exclusive resource used for military SATCOM with large installed fleets of standardized government terminals.

Ku band: The established commercial VSAT standard. Practical antenna sizes, wide coverage, extensive satellite infrastructure, and manageable rain fade in temperate climates make Ku the default choice for enterprise VSAT, maritime broadband, and aeronautical IFC. Orbital congestion and limited bandwidth per transponder are its principal constraints.

Ka band: The capacity leader. HTS spot beam frequency reuse enables orders-of-magnitude more aggregate throughput than conventional wide-beam satellites. The rain fade challenge is real but manageable in temperate climates with ACM and proper link budget discipline. Ka is the dominant choice for new HTS broadband deployments, and its role will only expand as LEO and MEO Ka-band constellations mature.

The right frequency band is the one that closes your link at your required availability, with an antenna that fits your platform, at a cost structure that matches your service economics. No single band is universally optimal—understanding the trade-offs is what separates a well-engineered satellite system from one that underperforms in the field.

---

Related Articles

• Ku Band vs Ka Band Satellite — Detailed comparison of the two dominant commercial VSAT frequency bands
• Rain Fade in Satellite Communications — Propagation physics of rain attenuation and mitigation techniques
• Satellite Link Budget Calculation — End-to-end power budget methodology for frequency band selection
• Maritime Satellite Internet — L-band, Ku-band, and Ka-band systems in maritime VSAT deployments
• Satellite Modulation and Coding — MODCOD selection and ACM for rain fade management across frequency bands
• Satellite Gateways, Teleports & PoPs — How C-band and Ka-band gateway infrastructure supports HTS networks